Walla Walla Islam

K, so here is a pic of the lil house of malaysia. A shop that Toun start build two years agone and only last year to complet accause they was always somethin else to do. So have posted a pic here but it do no do too much Justice to it so please excuse... Insyaallah will post other pic that better later...

Salam

For those in USA
	Tell Democrats: Don't Get Fooled Again Send a message telling top Democrats to speak out against bombing Iran. You’d certainly think Democrats in Congress would know better than to be manipulated into supporting an unnecessary war—again. But don’t count on it. Citizens are reacting in alarm while the administration considers bombing yet another Middle Eastern country against the advice of military leaders,1 but the Democrats have been almost silent. Democratic leaders should stand up, pound their podiums and loudly denounce the Bush Administration’s ideas about bombing Iran. Click here to send a message to top Democrats, including Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, insisting they speak out loudly, now, against any plans to bomb Iran. link It’s certainly clear that any rush to Iran is senseless, just as the bombing of Iraq was. Yes, the acquisition of nuclear weapons by any nation, and especially one which expresses hostility to our own, is a problem to be taken seriously. But the administration's own National Intelligence Estimate says it would take a decade before it could possibly happen.2 We now know that international inspections actually succeeded in stopping Iraq's nuclear weapons program,3 while experts on all sides of the political spectrum see nothing but another disaster if we attack Iran.4 So this time, let's learn from history. Our nation must honorably engage Iran, gather the best intelligence possible, and make rational decisions. And our leaders must make that point loud and clear, now, before the nation is frightened into another mistake. With hope for lessons learned, Matt Holland TrueMajority's Online Director References: 1 "The Iran Plans." The New Yorker, 4/8/2006. (Seymour Hersh article discussing Bush administration plans to attack Iran and opposition by military leaders) 2 "Iran Is Judged 10 Years From Nuclear Bomb." Washington Post, 8/2/2005. 3 "We Had Good Intel—The U.N.'s." Newsweek, 2/9/2006. 4 "Experts see any strike against Iran as problem." Chicago Tribune, 4/12/2006.

Walla Walla Islam

What Is Walla Walla Islam

Walla Walla Islam It a dream that Toun along with many others hope and pray Insyaallah, very soon to become real.. This a very small town here, 30k ppls and they only christian churches.. Also they jewish facility here and maybes even budhist too.. The dream it to build masjid in Walla Walla Washington. Have talked to many Muslims all over and when tell them that Toun from Walla Walla they all say 'Ma'ashaAllah nice name' they a history here and no one gonna know it well but gonna believe that afore the massacre in 1800's of the Walla Walla Native American, the native american themself were study islam and have the practice of muslims.. this till the Whitmans come and try to change the ways of natives to christianity, then the natives take insult for islam and they were incline to be kill the Whitman's...  U who read this probable already gonna know that the muslim Name all the city they were in with the name of Allah.. I.E. Tallahasee... and other american soil names after the muslim migrate to USA in early 1500's, and it were only later in Toun life that he learn why the muslims all say ma'ashaallah after they here the name, Walla Walla.  They think on Allah SAW so much they name it twice in the name... 

So now more than 400 yrs later, Try to introducing Islam  to Walla Walla again. To build a masjid in Allahs name, subhanallah.  They many others from surround towns that would wish to pray and it a very clear goal to also get community activities atween muslims to do bismillah...  Later. my wife, Rashida and Toun will be ask for donations for all good muslim brothers and sisters so they too may enjoy reward for to build this masjid... Thank u all very much for to show interest in this we do for Allah SWT... if any wish To e-mail Toun u may do this at tounuscan@yahoo.com. Please feel free to leave Comment also!

Salam for now

Dissonance Camp Cindy Stalking the president outside his Crawford retreat raises uncomfortable issues by MARC COOPER

With apologies to Don Rumsfeld, let’s say you have to go with the anti-war movement you’ve got — not the one you’d like to have. Camped out on the edge of George W. Bush’s Potemkin Crawford ranch, talking herself hoarse through dozens of interviews a day and speaking with the authority of the dead — in this case, her son Casey — Cindy Sheehan has become both a compelling and a curious national cause. To a parent who has lost a child, be it in war or on a dark two-lane highway, I am ready to grant a near-boundless emotional berth. That said, I would find Sheehan more compelling than curious (instead of the other way around) if she hadn’t already met with the president after her son was killed in Iraq last year; if her son had not been an adult who made a voluntary decision to enlist; and if Sheehan were not so emotionally cool about the grief that she says fuels her protest. I also would wish that the Usual Suspects — from Michael Moore to MoveOn.org — had not glommed onto Sheehan and her gesture. I would wish that the “progressive” PR firm of Fenton Communications had not sent a specialist out to her encampment to represent her. I am pained to hear Sheehan call for a U.S. withdrawal of troops also from Afghanistan. (Isn’t one of the more disturbing consequences of the invasion of Iraq the diversion of U.S. military forces away from that country?) I also get nervous when anyone claims to speak for the dead. Nor am I comfortable giving the relatives of slain soldiers special moral status in dealing with issues of war and peace. Such matters are a solemn responsibility as well as a right of all citizens, and we should be careful about elevating the standing of military families. It’s a dangerous gamble for the left; no matter how unpopular a war has become, it will always be easier for the right to mobilize that constituency. Can’t we soon anticipate something like the Swift Boat Veterans Against Cindy Sheehan to materialize at any moment? And yet, with all these hesitations — at least on my part — Cindy Sheehan has struck a national nerve. She stalks the president at a time when the American cause in Iraq seems as stalled, directionless and bloody as ever. U.S. combat casualties have soared. Suicide bombings and car-bombing attacks now come in daily multiples. The deadline for a new constitution came and went. At the precise moment when that deadline expired, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice had the temerity to appear on national television and say, “We are witnessing democracy at work in Iraq. The new constitution will be the most important document in the history of the new Iraq.” But only a day before, the White House had sent out a platoon of anonymous spinmeisters so that the Washington Post could report on its front page that the “Bush administration is significantly lowering expectations of what can be achieved in Iraq, recognizing that the United States will have to settle for far less progress than originally envisioned... [and]... no longer expects to see a model new democracy, a self-supporting oil industry or a society in which the majority of people are free from serious security or economic challenges, U.S. officials say.” In other words, the administration now concedes — though without direct attribution — that the American people should be ready to accept that this war is bound to result only in some form or other of an Islamic republic in Iraq. More: http://www.laweekly.com/ink/05/39/dissonance-cooper.php

For those who gonna vote he in, and even those who gonna lie and say the no vote for him.. This kinda for u.. Bush gonna need more than brain surgery now to get that cactus out he lil butt... No since LBJ have presidents approval rates be so low, 34%... Now gonna think even die hard who think USA still got chance gonna think again and gonna wanna impeachments..

salam

 

 Like the Japanese soldier marooned on an island for years after V-J Day, President Bush may be the last person in the country to learn that for Americans, if not Iraqis, the war in Iraq is over. "We will stay the course," he insistently tells us from his Texas ranch. What do you mean we, white man?

    A president can't stay the course when his own citizens (let alone his own allies) won't stay with him. The approval rate for Mr. Bush's handling of Iraq plunged to 34 percent in last weekend's Newsweek poll - a match for the 32 percent that approved L.B.J.'s handling of Vietnam in early March 1968. (The two presidents' overall approval ratings have also converged: 41 percent for Johnson then, 42 percent for Bush now.) On March 31, 1968, as L.B.J.'s ratings plummeted further, he announced he wouldn't seek re-election, commencing our long extrication from that quagmire.

     But our current Texas president has even outdone his predecessor; Mr. Bush has lost not only the country but also his army. Neither bonuses nor fudged standards nor the faking of high school diplomas has solved the recruitment shortfall. Now Jake Tapper of ABC News reports that the armed forces are so eager for bodies they will flout "don't ask, don't tell" and hang on to gay soldiers who tell, even if they tell the press.

    The president's cable cadre is in disarray as well. At Fox News Bill O'Reilly is trashing Donald Rumsfeld for his incompetence, and Ann Coulter is chiding Mr. O'Reilly for being a defeatist. In an emblematic gesture akin to waving a white flag, Robert Novak walked off a CNN set and possibly out of a job rather than answer questions about his role in smearing the man who helped expose the administration's prewar inflation of Saddam W.M.D.'s. (On this sinking ship, it's hard to know which rat to root for.)

    As if the right-wing pundit crackup isn't unsettling enough, Mr. Bush's top war strategists, starting with Mr. Rumsfeld and Gen. Richard Myers, have of late tried to rebrand the war in Iraq as what the defense secretary calls "a global struggle against violent extremism." A struggle is what you have with your landlord. When the war's number-managers start using euphemisms for a conflict this lethal, it's a clear sign that the battle to keep the Iraq war afloat with the American public is lost.

    That battle crashed past the tipping point this month in Ohio. There's historical symmetry in that. It was in Cincinnati on Oct. 7, 2002, that Mr. Bush gave the fateful address that sped Congressional ratification of the war just days later. The speech was a miasma of self-delusion, half-truths and hype. The president said that "we know that Iraq and Al Qaeda have had high-level contacts that go back a decade," an exaggeration based on evidence that the Senate Intelligence Committee would later find far from conclusive. He said that Saddam "could have a nuclear weapon in less than a year" were he able to secure "an amount of highly enriched uranium a little larger than a single softball." Our own National Intelligence Estimate of Oct. 1 quoted State Department findings that claims of Iraqi pursuit of uranium in Africa were "highly dubious

Mr. Driver pleaded for his life to deaf ears.

"About 30 people were saying, 'Let him up, it's too hot,' " Portz said. He said another employee brought a rug for Driver to lie on, but one of those holding Driver said he was fine where he was. "After about five minutes, (Driver) said, 'I'm dying, I can't breathe, call an ambulance,' " Portz said.

Employees struggled with Driver before he was handcuffed, Martin said.

"There was a struggle, and when they finally succeeded after getting him detained in handcuffs, he continued to struggle," Martin said.

After Driver was handcuffed, Portz said one employee had his knee on the man's neck and others were putting pressure on his back.

"Finally the guy stopped moving" and the employees got off him, Portz said. "They wouldn't call an ambulance."

"I looked at him and said, 'Hey, he's not breathing,' but one guy told me (Driver) was just on drugs. I told them his fingernails were all gray, and finally they called an ambulance."

 

MORE: http://kos.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/8/13/2421/42647

By Tony Rennell – Daily Mail, Saturday 6th August, 2005 Full Pages 36, 37 & 38, although NOT included on the Daily Mail web site.
	THE ACTUAL PICTURES ON THE DAILY MAIL ARTICLE ARE AS FOLLOWS:-
	The plot by America’s military bosses was devilish in both design and intent – to fabricate an outrage against innocent civilians, fool the world and provide a pretext for war.  In the pentagon, a top secret team drew up a plan to simultaneously send up two airliners painted and numbered exactly the same, one from a civil airport in America, the other from a secret military airbase nearby. The one from the airport would have military personnel on board who had checked in as ordinary passengers under false names.  The one from the airbase would be an empty drone, a remote-controlled unmanned aircraft. Somewhere along their joint flight paths, the passenger-carrying plane would drop below radar height, and disappear, landing back at the airbase and unloading its occupants in secret. More: http://www.financialoutrage.org.uk/911_mainstream_media.htm

The Iraq war is over, and the winner is... Iran

Hamstrung by the Iraq debacle, all Bush can do is gnash his teeth as the hated mullahs in Iran cozy up to their co-religionists in Iraq.

By Juan Cole

07/21/05 "Salon.com" - - Iraq's new government has been trumpeted by the Bush administration as a close friend and a model for democracy in the region. In contrast, Bush calls Iran part of an axis of evil and dismisses its elections and government as illegitimate. So the Bush administration cannot have been filled with joy when Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari and eight high-powered cabinet ministers paid an extremely friendly visit to Tehran this week.

The two governments went into a tizzy of wheeling and dealing of a sort not seen since Texas oil millionaires found out about Saudi Arabia. Oil pipelines, port access, pilgrimage, trade, security, military assistance, were all on the table in Tehran. All the sorts of contracts and deals that U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney had imagined for Halliburton, and that the Pentagon neoconservatives had hoped for Israel, were heading instead due east.

Jaafari's visit was a blow to the Bush administration's strategic vision, but a sweet triumph for political Shiism. In the dark days of 1982, Tehran was swarming with Iraqi Shiite expatriates who had been forced to flee Saddam Hussein's death decree against them. They had been forced abroad, to a country with which Iraq was then at war. Ayatollah Khomeini, the newly installed theocrat of Iran, pressured the expatriates to form an umbrella organization, the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI), which he hoped would eventually take over Iraq. Among its members were Jaafari and Abdul Aziz al-Hakim. On Jan. 30, 2005, Khomeini's dream finally came true, courtesy of the Bush administration, when the Supreme Council and the Dawa Party won the Iraqi elections.

Jaafari, a Dawa Party activist working for an Islamic republic, had been in exile in Tehran from 1980 to 1989. A physician trained at Mosul, the reserved and somewhat inarticulate Jaafari studied Shiite law and theology as an auditor at the seminaries of Qom. His party, Dawa, was briefly part of SCIRI but in 1984 split with it to maintain its autonomy.

Iraq has a Shiite Muslim majority of some 62 percent. Iran's Shiite majority is thought to be closer to 90 percent. The Shiites of the two countries have had a special relationship for over a millennium. Saddam had sealed the border for more than two decades, but throughout centuries, tens of thousands of Iranians have come on pilgrimage to the holy Shiite shrines of Najaf and Karbala every year. Iraqis likewise go to Iran for pilgrimage, study and trade. Although neoconservatives like Paul Wolfowitz maintained before the Iraq war that Iraqis are more secular and less interested in an Islamic state than Iranians, in fact the ideas of Khomeini had had a deep impact among Iraqi Shiites. When they could vote in January earlier this year, they put the Khomeini-influenced Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq in control of seven of the nine southern provinces, along with Baghdad itself.

It was not only history that brought Jaafari to the foothills of the Alborz mountains. The Iraqi prime minister was attempting to break out of the box into which his government has been stuffed by the Sunni Arab guerrilla movement. Jaafari's government does not control the center-north or west of the country and cannot pump much petroleum from Kirkuk because of oil sabotage. Trucking to Jordan is often difficult. The Jaafari government depends heavily on the Rumaila oil field in the south, but lacks refining capability. Iraq lacks a deep water port on the Gulf and needs to replace inland "ports" like Amman because of poor security. An initiative toward the east could resolve many of these problems, strengthening the Shiites against the Sunni guerrillas economically and militarily and so saving the new government.

MORE: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article9540.htm

Haunted by the threat of impeachment, Bush has received the news that he dreaded most. A majority of the U.S. public doubts the United States will win in Iraq and believes Bush intentionally misled the country about Iraq's weapons capabilities, according to a USA Today/CNN/Gallup poll. Previous Gallop polls have asked the same questions, but this was the first time that over half of those polled - 51 per cent - believed Bush deliberately misled the people when he asserted Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, USA Today said. As we reported two weeks ago, more than "two-in-five voters (42%) say they would favor impeachment proceedings if it is found the President misled the nation about his reasons for going to war with Iraq," according to a recent Zogby Poll. The war in Iraq is one of the greatest atrocities in recent times. The Bush Administration's combination of arrogance with an utter disregard for the law requires Congress to immediately proceed with filing Articles of Impeachment. Tens of millions of people know with certainty that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and other leading officials lied to them. That is why the impeachment movement has developed as a nationwide grassroots political phenomenon. On September 24, hundreds of thousands of people will be in the streets for major antiwar demonstrations in Washington DC, San Francisco and Los Angeles. The impeachment movement is organizing a major contingent for September 24 at the White House.     Undeterred by the bitter cold and intimidation tactics of the police, thousands upon thousands brought the antiwar and impeachment message to Bush's coronation, January 20, 2005. ImpeachBush.org/VoteToImpeach.org signs and banners will be everywhere that day. Thanks to the support of so many people, the publicity and outreach campaign is in full gear and will get stronger in the weeks ahead. Supporting this campaign makes all the difference. Listed below are some of the cities that we know are already mobilizing buses and car caravans to come to the September 24 demonstration at the White House. It is already an incredible list that will surely double in size as we intensify our work, getting out leaflets, posters, stickers as well as the phonebanking and national outreach efforts. This is a huge, national effort and the expenses are great. Every day volunteers sacrifice their time and energy. But we can only succeed with the donations and contributions of people who believe that nothing is more important than holding Bush and other high officials accountable for their criminal conduct. Please make a contribution and tell a friend and family member to so as well. To make a contribution on our secure server, where you can also obtain information to write a check, click here.  Cities already organizing transportation to the White House on September 24 include: - Albuquerque, NM - Ann Arbor, MI - Baltimore, MD - Bangor, ME - Berkeley Springs, WV - Birmingham, AL - Boston, MA - Buffalo, NY - Cape May, NJ - Charlotte, NC - Chattanooga, TN - Cleveland, OH - Chicago, IL - Cobleskill, NY - Dallas, TX - Detroit, MI - Dubuque, IA - Evansville, IN - Fayetteville, NC - Gainesville, FL - Geneseo, NY - Gulfport, MS - Hackensack, NJ - Harrisburg, PA - Harrisonburg, VA - Hattiesburg, MS - Jacksonville, FL - Kingston, NY - Lancaster, PA - Lafayette, LA - Linwood, NJ - Louisville, KY - Luck, WI - Macon, GA - Memphis, TN - Meridian, MS - Burlington, VT - Montpelier, VT - New Brunswick, NJ - New Paltz, NY - New York City, NY - Newark, DE - Newark, NJ - Pleasantville, NJ - Poughkeepsie, NY - Philadelphia, PA - Reno, NV - Richmond, VA - Rochester, NY - Sarasota, FL - Sault Ste. Marie, MI - Schenectady, NY - St. Petersburg, FL - Tuscaloosa, AL - West Chester, PA & many more! 500,000 people marched in DC at the A.N.S.W.E.R.-initiated demonstration on January 18, 2003.

Not in the name of Islam... 5 words no very big but with big meaning... How many times the muslim gonna have to say this afore the jews, christians and kaafir gonna believe it? This next article depict one very boisterous Christian? Jew? Who think she gonna know all and keep very accurate detail from the back of her spacious yard in upper manhatten. What she do it to spread more lies on the muslim and make the kaafir world think we no gonna care, (Those that gonna listen to her shrieks...

 

Last year, CAIR launched a petition titled “Not in the Name of Islam” with the intent of distancing the world’s 1.5 billion decent and law-abiding Muslims from the brutal acts of a few fanatics.

In Britain, the Muslim Council “utterly” condemned the acts of terror on the capital’s transport system, adding, “these evil deeds make victims of us all”.

Yet, Feinstein says that “few, if any, leading imams are saying ‘enough of this. Stop. This is not Islam’”, which cannot but lead one to imagine she has spent the last few years in solitary confinement without media access.

And when the good senator asks Muslim clerics “to issue fatwa after fatwa denouncing jihad,” she, once again, displays her ignorance. If Muslim clerics were to denounce “jihad”, they would no longer be considered Muslims let alone Muslim clerics. Jihad or “struggle” is a fundamental of Islam incumbent upon individuals and should not be equated with mindless terrorism in the way Feinstein appears to be doing. : More: http://www.arabnews.com/?page=7&section=0&article=67507&d=26&m=7&y=2005

No that any of u very interested in London killing or that Man involve to be killed were no Muslim but it were worst case of Racial Profiling that come in last decade or even that u gonna care that it gonna soon come to ur neighborhood... or even that Blair already go against he first statement that were something like The londoners gonna stay true to form and life go on like ALWAYS!  Maybes u no even gonna care that the always he mean were to catch/jump then shoot 5 times without to even ask a questions... This for that....

 

BLAIR SORRY OVER SHOOTING

Britain's senior policeman has apologised to the family of Jean Charles de Menezes, the innocent Brazilian man shot dead at Stockwell Station.

"This is a tragedy. The Metropolitan Police accepts full responsibility for this. To the family I can only express my deep regrets," Sir Ian Blair told Sunday with Adam Boulton on Sky News.

Brazil wants an explanation for the shooting of the 27-year-old who police mistook for a suicide bomber.

He was killed by officers on Friday as he tried to board a Tube train at Stockwell, south London.

Brazil's Foreign Minister Celso Amorim is expected to demand an explanation from Foreign Secretary Jack Straw when the two hold talks on UN reform.

A statement from officials in Sao Paulo said: "The government expects the British authorities to explain the circumstances that led to this tragedy."

MORE: http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-1190065,00.html

 Commentary  -   Jul 23, 2005
- The "Magic Bomb" Theory
   by Mark Faulk    This is a story about disappearing terrorists, nonexistent bags, and botched investigations, but most of all, this is a story about magic bombs.

    It's Crime Scene Investigation 101. It the basic law of physics. It's so elementary, my dear Watson, that even a dancer who was dazed from the shock of being one of only two victims who survived while seated directly over the spot where one of the bombs was planted in the London tube carriage two weeks ago could figure it out.

    In a seemingly innocuous article in the British newspaper Cambridge Evening News, 32 year-old dance instructor Bruce Lait, in an interview from his hospital bed, said that ""The policeman said 'mind that hole, that's where the bomb was'. The metal was pushed upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train. They seem to think the bomb was left in a bag, but I don't remember anybody being where the bomb was, or any bag."

    Read that last part again, very slowly, and let it sink in. "The metal was pushed upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train." "They seem to think the bomb was left in a bag, but I don't remember anybody being where the bomb was, or any bag."

And the British authorities on the crime scene missed that, and just assumed that it was a carry-on bomb? C'mon, how many times have you seen that bad TV show where the eccentric detective figures out that the crime was an "inside job" because the glass was outside the broken window, not inside where it should have been. I repeat: Crime Scene Investigation 101. Basic physics.

    While describing the scene, Lait said about he and his dance partner Crystal Main, "Out of that whole carriage, I think Crystal and I were the only ones who were not seriously injured, and I think we were nearest the bomb."

    He went on to describe those sitting closest to him and Main when the bomb went off. "I remember an Asian guy, there was a white guy with tracksuit trousers and a baseball cap, and there were two old ladies sitting opposite me." He described the woman whose body was lying on top of him when he regained consciousness as a "middle-aged woman who had blonde curly hair, was dressed in black, and could have been a businesswoman."

    Again, play close attention here. "We were nearest the bomb." An Asian guy, a white guy, two old ladies, and a blond businesswoman......and two dancers.

    So.....if the bomb was in a bag carried on by the terrorist, how could two dancers be "nearest the bomb"? And why didn't the person who was the closest eyewitness see the bomber, or even ANYONE, sitting where the bomb went off? Why was the metal pushed upwards if the bomb was inside of the train carriage?

    Let's put this in perspective, piece by piece:

    "The metal was pushed upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train."

    "I don't remember anybody being where the bomb was, or any bag."

    "We were nearest the bomb."

    An Asian guy, a white guy, two old ladies, and a blond businesswoman......and two dancers.

    Here we go again. Another terrorist event with more questions than answers, questions that the major media (yet again) aren't even asking.

    Hell, I'll even take a stab at answering them:

    The metal was pushed upwards because THE BOMB WAS UNDERNEATH THE TRAIN.

    Lait didn't remember seeing anyone, or a bag that could be holding a bomb, near the point of detonation because there was no bomber sitting there, there was no bag. THE BOMB WAS UNDERNEATH THE TRAIN.

    An Asian guy, a white guy, two old ladies, and a blond businesswoman......and two dancers. There was no Islamic radical, no Mideastern terrorist sitting in that carriage. THE BOMB WAS UNDERNEATH THE TRAIN.

    Dance partners Bruce Lait and Crystal Main were nearest the bomb.....again, no Islamic radical, no Mideastern terrorist sitting in that carriage. THE BOMB WAS UNDERNEATH THE TRAIN.

     We were praised by some, and criticized by others, for posting an article by Jeff Buckley (entitled "London Calling") the day after the first London bombings two weeks ago that questioned the motives behind the bombings, and that asked readers to view the inevitable "official government response" with a healthy grain of skepticism.

    Here's how Jeff so aptly put it:

    "So, when you see the headlines dominated by this story and the mounting evidence of lies, deception, and treason being forever pushed to the back burner, be sure to ask yourself, 'Who benefits from this?' Before you throw your support behind administrations that only have doublespeak, deceit, and death to show for their efforts, be sure to ask yourself, 'Who benefits from this?' And, before you allow yourself to be steamrolled and swept away by the inevitable surge of jingoistic retaliatory euphoria, be sure to ask yourself, 'Who benefits from this?'"

    "Who benefits from this?"

    So here we are, barely two weeks (and another "symbolic" bombing episode) later, and the voices of the Far Right are busy spinning this as yet another excuse for the war in Iraq.....even though the suspected terrorists are Pakistanis. (Sound familiar? The 9/11 terrorists were mostly from Saudi Arabia, so...."Let's bomb Iraq!")

    "Who benefits from this?"

    Here we are barely two weeks later, and the disciples of doublespeak are busy blaming a group of suicide bombers with carry-on bags, even though those who died are the most unlikely group of "suicide bombers" ever to commit an act of terrorism.

    "Who benefits from this?"

    Here we are barely two weeks later, and Bush and Company is using the London bombings to.....successfully.....push through the renewal of the Patriot Act. "Screw the Constitution, they're bombing us!"

    The official spinmeisters are either ignoring the signs that something is just not right here, or dismissing those of us who are questioning the official response as the usual bunch of fringe conspiracy theorists.

    Well guess what? If we don't keep asking the hard questions, and demanding honest, straightforward answers to those questions, then no one will. They've deceived us a million times before, and if honest Americans don't continue to hold our public officials accountable for their actions and demand the truth, then they will continue to spoon feed us lie after lie after lie....until we eventually all suffocate under the weight of mass deception. And THAT'S the Faulking Truth

 Within Iran there are more than 450 major strategic targets, including numerous suspected nuclear-weapons-program development sites.  Many of the targets are hardened or are deep underground and could not be taken out by conventional weapons, hence the nuclear option.  As in the case of Iraq, the response is not conditional on Iran actually being involved in the act of terrorism directed against the United States.  Several senior Air Force officers involved in the planning are reportedly appalled at the implications of what they are doing--that Iran is being set up for an unprovoked nuclear attack--but no one is prepared to damage his career by posing any objections. More : http://www.justinlogan.com/justinlogancom/2005/07/what_is_the_pla.html

 

 

MORE:http: http://www.niagarafallsreporter.com/gallagher222.html

 Bismillah

 

   Salam Alaikum,

 

 

 This Video Clip deals with Ann Coulter & Tucker Carson Disrespecting Canada...

 

Coulter: 'Canada is lucky we allow them to exist on the

        ;        ; Continent!'

 

Carsonnbsp; 'Without the U.S., Canada is Essentially Honduras!'

 

http://mediamatters.org/static/video/cc-2 00412010011.wmv

 

 

Fi Amanillah

Ziad.

Ann Coultre  at best a 4th rate journalist, that noone, who have any brains, (that no r republicans), gonna pay that much attentions too.. Only for laugh they keep her on. This were a fox vid clip so course it gonna be republican, (brainless), based.  Tucker he a white demongod, (very prejudice in veiw and actions), who should be castrated very soon in order to prevent him to breed anymore ilk...

salam bro

Toun

RE: **{CANADA BASHING: MENDING FENCES???}**
Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 12:04pm	Reply Quote
Bismillah    Salam Alaikum,  True, but with the Extremists Running the Ccountry and the Media, these 'PRESTITUTES' are getting Ample Air Time...

 

RE: **{CANADA BASHING: MENDING FENCES???}**
Posted: 21 Jul 2005, 12:39pm	Edit Reply Quote
gonna look at it this ways ziad... Fox news is basical a white republican predjudice channels.. With republicans to take over on media, (they bought out Fox news 10 yrs agone), no news on TV it worthy to keep eye on... Republicans may put whoever they think gonna give they the best kinda coverage in they own thinking... If they wanna start a war with canadia, they gonna do it thru media news... like they do with Iraq and Afghanistan..  So far it have only to be far right wings ann (Guttermouth) Coulter and Mark (suckbutt) Turner, and gonna think that even most republicans gonna laugh at them when they no looken... Think it like these two very right wingers that have be go so far right wing that even the right wingers they were set up to defend gonna move to the left just to avoid the scandals... salam bro..

 

This article confirm the belief that over 50% of republicans are severely developemental disabled... Was it always this ways? remember times when republicans were kinda scary.. but munkeyboy bush jr. kinda laid foundations for whole other breed of republican that gonna be otherwise just to be work the menial jobs....  Since munkeyboy president now they a whole lotta other Mental disable ppls that have opinions, "If he can do it.... So can I..." kinda mark the ways to WWIII and WWIV all in one.. It very clear nowdays the republican do no think that well.. Maybes he may throw a bomb better eh?

salam

 

 

Washington - Turkey's foreign minister Tuesday condemned Rep. Tom Tancredo as a "fanatic" as the Colorado Republican's comments about bombing Muslim holy sites in retaliation for a terrorist nuclear strike echoed around the world.

"This was nothing but a fanatic speaking completely personally, irresponsibly and without thought of how far his statements would reach or what kind of problems they would create," Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul said, according to Turkey's Anatolia news agency.

Meanwhile, the U.S. State Department labeled Tancredo's remarks Friday on a radio talk show "insulting to Islam," and Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean joined the chorus of those calling on the Littleton Republican to apologize.

Tancredo's 6th District constituents interviewed Tuesday mostly criticized their congressman's comments.

"Tancredo's stirring up a lot of trouble that doesn't need to be

	Friday: On Florida radio, Tancredo suggests, You could take out their holy sites, when describing a possible response to a nuclear attack by Islamic extremists. Monday: Muslim leaders criticize Tancredo s comments. Tuesday: The State Department calls the comments insulting to Islam. Turkey s foreign minister calls Tancredo a fanatic. (AP)

stirred," said Melinda Pride,

MORE: http://www.denverpost.com/nationworld/ci_2872009

Toun: So it be maybes one and 1/2 week now since London be bombed and still no one word of who for sure do it.. do bombing in london leave no word for blame on who do it? Were it the IRA, (Allah know that UK done enuff to them to P.O. em very bad), or have they already decide it were some unknown Muslim group to do it for Jihad? No even very sure what kaafir mean when they use the word anymore...  Maybes they come up with new group like the Pigmy Irishman of Great Sundar, (PIGS)...

salam

 

Thezman:  Bismillah

     Salam Alaikum,

  They're casting a wide net toun...All I heard Bliar say, was that it's an evil ideology within Islam taught by radical Imams. And the Trail so far leads to Egypt and Pakistani Schools.

   If you look at the Men (they Alledge) who carried out this operation, they were all very normal citizens, and didn't fit the terrorist profile. And plastering photo's of a person carrying a backpack isn't proof that he actually did anything,

look at how many people have backpacks.

   So, by saying that even muslims who are born in Western Nations, and who are absolutely normal, can "Snap" at any moment, therefore every one will be under suspicion, Guilty Until Proven Innocent. 

   I read that a British Parlimentarian is Sponsoring a law to ban certain Ayat from the Holy Qur'an that "Preach" hate, violence, war, or Anti-Semitism from being recited in public, maybe even (in the future, the way things are going) to actually delete those Ayat, at least from any Qur'an in England. I wouldn't put it past any government now.

   That way, by giving a general definition (that is very vague) of what constitues terror, they can stick that label on anyone they choose.

   Of course state terror or state sponsored terror by proxy isn't included in the definition. Many Muslim Nations wanted to have an International Meeting to specifically define what terror is, but nothing transpired.

   So far a terrorist is anyone who Resists (National Resistance), Wars of liberation, any Dissenting Voice...For God's Sake, they even classify Environmental Groups and Activists as Terrorists now

 

Toun:

The Evil within, and toun no talken the muslim or even the would be terrorist.. For sure gonna know they gonna blame this on the muslim, if no direct then in-direct ways... U say that " And the Trail so far leads to Egypt and Pakistani Schools." well really gonna wanna know what that gotta do on anything? did they track would be culprit from or to there? The sheeple no ask the right questions and without they be the right questions asked it give the one who have power more right to hunt in the kings forest.

Gonna here on that backpack thing in the states, blair had he stoney nose pasti face all over the news, just like bush after 911. gonna feel very sad for londoners but if this turn to be gone ways of 911 then all bets are off and gonna hate england same like USA. this should no be happenen bro.. Tell u for very true... Blair signed up with devil and now he walk crooked and u gonna wonder why? The republicans all klu klux klan white party conservatives... Those three things u no ever wanna see hear or smell... leastways over 60% of americans no gonna wanna.  8% they no sure if they wanna or no and 2 %, well they braindead... But it a sure thing that 80% would be more happy without them ever to be born

Somehow gonna know.. This exact what they do in the movie, "The Planet Of The Apes" To get eventual hybrid monkey that totem guns and ridem horsey and enslaved Charleton Heston... Remember that? sure u do.. Read on...

 

SCIENTISTS have been warned that their latest experiments may accidently produce monkeys with brains more human than animal.

In cutting-edge experiments, scientists have injected human brain cells into monkey fetuses to study the effects.

Critics argue that if these fetuses are allowed to develop into self-aware subjects, science will be thrown into an ethical nightmare.

An eminent committee of American scientists will call for restrictions into the research, saying the outcome of such studies cannot be predicted and may in fact produce subjects with a 'super-animal' intelligence.

The high-powered committee of animal behaviourists, lawyers, philosophers, bio-ethicists and neuro-scientists was established four years ago to examine the growing numbers of human/monkey experiments

More: http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,15891104-13762,00.html

WHAT: "Not in the Name of Islam" PSA Campaign Launch News Conference
WHEN: Thursday, July 14, 10:30 a.m.
WHERE: National Press Club, Zenger Room, 529 14th Street NW (13th Floor), Washington, D.C.
SATELLITE DISTRIBUTION: The PSA will be distributed by C-Band satellite on Thursday, July 14 at 2:00-2:15 p.m. (EDT), 11:00-11:15 a.m. (PT), IA 6 Transponder 16, D/L Freq: 4020 (H) 93°WL, Standard Audio: 6.2, 6.8 RE-FEED: Tuesday, July 19, 2:00-2:15 p.m. (EDT), 11:00-11:15 a.m. (PT), IA 6 Transponder 16, D/L Freq: 4020 (H) 93°WL, Standard Audio: 6.2, 6.8 (The PSA will also be available on CAIR's web site, www.cair.com, following Thursday's news conference.)

At the National Press Club news conference, CAIR will present the 30-second PSA featuring American Muslims stating: "We often hear claims Muslims don't condemn terrorism and that Islam condones violence. As Muslims, we want to state clearly that those who commit acts of terror in the name of Islam are betraying the teachings of the Quran and the Prophet Muhammad. We reject anyone ­ of any faith - who commits such brutal acts and will not allow our faith to be hijacked by criminals. Islam is not about hatred and violence. It's about peace and justice." BETA copies of the PSAs, produced by West Glen Communications, will be available at the news conference.

As communications director of the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations, he drafted the condemnation statement immediately after 9/11. It was published, among other places, as a full-page ad in The Washington Post. Then, Hooper spent the next three-plus years hearing angry talk that Muslims hadn't spoken out.

"It's one of the things we still hear: 'Why won't Muslims condemn terrorism?'" he was saying at week's end.

"When I go on a radio talk show, that is the first thing that I hear. That's just not true. Muslims - not only CAIR but all the groups - have been condemning terrorism for years. Some people just don't want to hear it."

So Muslims have to keep trying, he said. "Whenever we have the opportunity, we'll say it again. 'We denounce it. We denounce it.' We are hoping to be heard this time."

Copyright 2005 Newsday Inc.

More: http://www.newsday.com/news/columnists/ny-nyhen104338161jul10,0,3857674,print.column